After an
application for review is lodged
Added Parties
Case Managers
SSAT access to Centrelink
information
The Hearing Panel
Hearing Options
Prosecution
After an application for review of a PPL decision is received by the SSAT an acknowledgement letter is sent out explaining what happens next. Centrelink has 28 days to provide the SSAT with a written explanation of its decision in addition to the original or a copy of documents in possession of Centrelink which are relevant to the review. Centrelink must also provide a copy of the statement and documents to each party.
Usually SSAT hearings involve only the person who lodged the
application for review. Sometimes, however, another person is added
to the application. This person is called an 'added party'. This
will happen where the SSAT considers that other person (the added
party) is affected by the decision. An employer cannot be added as
a party.
The SSAT has a specific process to add another person as a party.
The added party will only receive a decision which relates to the
issues which are common to both parties. There will be disclosure
of relevant information to both parties. The Case Manager can
explain more about the added party process.
Each application for review to the SSAT is assigned an SSAT Case
Manager. The Case Manager is the first point of contact for parties
wishing to contact the SSAT about their application for review.
Parties are not able to contact an SSAT member outside a hearing
setting.
The Case Manager's role is to:
What cannot be done by the Case Manager?
SSAT staff and members can access details on the Centrelink
computer database only for the purpose of an application for review
to the SSAT. This is so that the Tribunal can obtain all material
which is necessary for your review. Centrelink also send documents
from an applicant's file to the SSAT and to the parties.
The SSAT members and staff cannot alter the information which is
contained in the Centrelink computer. All staff and members are
bound by strict secrecy provisions which prevent them from
disclosing any information obtained in the course of their duties
to unauthorised people.
Most hearings are conducted by one member however the size and
composition of the panel is determined by the nature and complexity
of the application. The legislation permits a maximum panel size of
four.
The Presiding Member is responsible for the proper conduct of the
hearing and the effective determination of cases.
The majority of SSAT hearings are conducted face-to-face,
although there are regional variations.
Telephone
conferencing and video-conferencing
provide an alternative in appropriate cases.
To ensure the accessibility of its services to those living
outside metropolitan areas, the SSAT may also conduct hearings in
regional
centres throughout the country.
For
international applicants the best option is by telephone. The
SSAT will call you for the hearing so you will not incur costs for
the call. With international cases, the matter will not be listed
for hearing until after the Centrelink papers have been received by
the applicant.
For further information about SSAT Hearings please see At The Hearing.
In some matters which are reviewed by the SSAT (eg. some debt
matters), Centrelink may have considered whether prosecution action
should be taken. Prosecution involves the investigation and laying
of a criminal charge in a court. This process is completely
separate from the SSAT process. The SSAT cannot make any directions
about a prosecution and has no role in deciding whether a
prosecution should take place.
A person is not compelled to attend the SSAT and give information
to the SSAT or answer its questions. A person does not have to do
anything which may incriminate himself/herself. However if there is
an absence of explanation by the person on a relevant issue or
matter at hearing, a natural consequence may be that the person's
case is not assisted.
Centrelink receives a copy of the written decision of the Tribunal
(which includes reasons) and it is possible that information
obtained as part of the SSAT hearing process may be used by
Centrelink to conduct an investigation or otherwise pursue
prosecution action.
It is desirable to get legal advice before pursuing a review in
the SSAT where prosecution action has already been indicated by
Centrelink. However, any debt will stand unless it is altered by
Centrelink or changed via the review process.